Coursework Brief |
|
Module Code | SS22120 |
Module Title | Sport and Exercise Physiology |
Module Coordinator | |
Coursework Tutor |
|
Coursework Title |
Laboratory Report |
Weighting in module | 50% |
Submission Deadline | 12:00 pm (midday), Friday 9th December |
Submission information | Submit via TurnItIn |
Word/length limit | 2000 words ± 10% submissions which fall outside of this will be penalised |
Learning Outcomes to be addressed by the coursework:
1. Demonstrate a detailed knowledge of the adjustment, regulation and integration of physiological systems during exercise. 5. Demonstrate practical competence in a range of advanced physiological assessment techniques. 6. Compile a written laboratory report demonstrating the critical analysis and interpretation of data. |
|
Written assignments MUST be in your own words. Do NOT take short cuts by copying even the smallest amount of material from anywhere (including the internet, books or another student’s text). This is plagiarism and will be detected. AU procedures and penalties for ‘Unacceptable Academic Practice’ are strict, |
Electronic Submission
- (1) Save your work in Microsoft Office or PDF format. (2) Upload the file to Turnitin by selecting ‘Upload’. (3) Check the file submitted is the correct one and the formatting on the preview page is correct. (4) Complete your submission by selecting ‘Submit’ and await an email ‘Confirmation receipt’. Keep this as proof of your submission.
- Please note that the ‘Blackboard Assignment’ submission points do not provide receipts.
- Unless otherwise noted above, Turnitin allows you to overwrite your submissions. You are advised to submit your work at least once as a draft well before the deadline in case of last minute problems.
- Failure to follow this advice may result in a mark of zero if your submission is not uploaded or is in an unreadable format.
Marks/Feedback Return Date: | 6th January 2017 |
Clarification of coursework brief
It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand the requirements of the coursework that has been set. IBERS staff policy is to reply to emails within three working days so you should not expect a response in time to help if you ask for guidance less than three days before the deadline.
University policy on late/non-submission
Work submitted after the deadline without an extension will have the mark reduced to zero.
Extension to coursework deadlines
Only Senior Tutors may grant extensions.
Extensions may be awarded in exceptional circumstances, e.g. on medical grounds, or for genuine, unforeseen personal circumstances such as illness, family problems or death of a relative or close personal friend. You may apply for an extension using the Extension Request Form available to download from the ‘Undergraduate Information’ or ‘Information for Taught PG Students’ module on Blackboard. This should be submitted together with any supporting documentary evidence such as a medical certificate to the Student Admin Team Office, ground floor Edward Llwyd Building. In order to be awarded an extension, students should inform the department (with appropriate evidence) three working days before the deadline. If insufficient evidence is submitted then the extension will not be awarded.
Failure of computers, printers and backups etc. will not be accepted as reasons for late submission of assessed work.
Please refer to your handbook for further information on Coursework Extensions.
If an extension has not been confirmed, then you should always submit an attempt of the work by the deadline.
Via Blackboard, access the data you generated in weeks 5, 6 and 7 during the practical sessions Anaerobic performance and capacity, using these data produce a written scientific report on the practical you completed.
The report must conform to standard scientific format and comprise of; Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, Reference list. Work must be word-processed, double spaced, in size 12 Arial font.
You will be assessed on the following:
Title: Succinct, clear and accurate
Introduction: Background information on the importance of measuring anaerobic performance and capacity; summary of methods available including previous research that has measured anaerobic performance and capacity; assumptions and issues relating to the measurement of anaerobic performance and capacity; aim of research.
Method: Detail on Subjects, equipment and protocols, do not use lists and bullet points. Correct style for referencing equipment. Identify statistical analysis to be performed.
Results: Highlight main points in text using figures and tables to support text. Using text, tables and figures when appropriate, reference all figures and tables in text. Use of appropriate figure format, correct format of tables.
Discussion: Explain each of the main findings in relation to the issues raised in the introduction, appropriate reference to the primary literature.
Referencing: Correct format (APA); appropriate number of sources
Generic marking criteria are given below. It is likely that your work will contain elements which match the criteria for more than one degree class. This will be reflected in the feedback you receive and in your final mark.
’Further Reading’ beyond course material is expected and will vary according to the topic, the level of the work (sub-degree to masters) and the length of the work submitted. The great majority of such reading should ordinarily be peer reviewed primary research for Masters work, while text books and other tertiary sources will ordinarily not be acceptable. Definitions of primary, secondary and tertiary sources can be found here: http://www.lib.umd.edu/tl/guides/primary-sources. Students should note that web pages by individuals, blogs, pressure groups and companies are very unlikely to be deemed an appropriate source.
Mark % | Class
FDSc |
Class
BSc |
BSc & FDSc marking criteria for Other Written Work Other types of assessment may include lab reports, summaries, technical reports, case studies etc. While the criteria below are a guide, you should also check the coursework brief for specific guidance on expectations. |
90-100 | Distinction | 1 | The work presented will be factually faultless and entirely focused on the task set. There will be excellent coverage and extensive evidence of supplementary reading. |
80-89 | Distinction | 1 | The work presented will be factually virtually faultless and clearly focused on the task set. There will be comprehensive coverage and good evidence of supplementary reading. |
70-79 | Distinction | 1 | The work will be factually correct and focused on the task set. There will be some evidence of outside reading and very good coverage and presentation. |
60-69 | Merit | 2.1 | The work will be a comprehensive attempt at the task i.e. factually sound, clear and logical. |
50-59 | Merit
————- 54 Pass |
2.2 | The work will be accurate but limited in depth or coverage. There may be some errors or key facts missing or misinterpreted.
Presentation or organisation may hinder communication of the material. |
40-49 | Pass | 3 | Information will be sparse or inaccurate but broadly relevant to the question. The work will lack depth or coverage. Presentation or organisation will hinder communication of the salient material. |
30-39 | Fail | Fail | The work presented will be poorly directed at the question. There will be many omissions or errors but some relevant facts will be correct. The work will lack convincing demonstration of understanding. |
20-29 | Fail | Fail | The material will be largely irrelevant to the task set with many omissions and / or errors. Organisation will be poor. |
10-19 | Fail | Fail | The work will be lacking in length or irrelevant to the question. There will be little substance / factual material presented. |
0-9 | Fail | Fail | There will be almost no relevant / correct material included. |