Module 2 – Case
Planning for Emergencies: NIMS; Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis
Case Assignment
The results of the Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis prepared by your staff found that your community is equally at risk for at least four different types of disasters. You believe that you have to plan for all four potential disasters. However, your City Manager with the support of the city council is urging you to develop a general EMP that can be utilized for all disasters. You have been requested to prepare a report to the City Manager supporting your position as to why a general plan will not best serve the interests of the community in case of a disaster.
1.List and describe your arguments in support of a disaster-specific plan. Briefly, justify your response.
2.List and describe your arguments in support of a general EMP. Briefly, justify your response.
3.Do you believe that NIMS (ICS) will work effectively regardless of which type of plan is ultimately developed? Support your answer.
Papers should be at least three pages long.
Assignment Expectations
Critical analysis of the strengths and limitations of specific and general response plans should be provided. Demonstrate an understanding of the broad applicability of NIMS.
References: At least two references should be included from academic sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles). Required readings are included. Quoted material should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. When material is copied verbatim from external sources, it must be enclosed in quotes. The references should be cited within the text and also listed at the end of the assignment in the References section (preferably in APA format).
Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper.
Format: APA format is recommended.
Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity.
The following items will be assessed in particular:
?Relevance: All content is connected to the question.
?Precision: Specific question is addressed. Statements, facts, and statistics are specific and accurate.
?Depth of discussion: Points that lead to deeper issues are presented and integrated.
?Breadth: Multiple perspectives and references, and multiple issues/factors are considered.
?Evidence: Points are well-supported with facts, statistics, and references.
?Logic: Presented discussion makes sense; conclusions are logically supported by premises, statements, or factual information.
?Clarity: Writing is concise, understandable, and contains sufficient detail or examples.
?Objectivity: Paper avoids use of first person and subjective bias.
Module 2 – SLP ( Writer: please write 3 pages for this assignment, also you need to make the following changes to this assignment from the professor: Good start but for SLP, I would like you to include some graphics such as maps, charts, figures, photos, etc to underscore your evaluation.Good work otherwise.
Planning for Emergencies: NIMS; Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis
For this assignment, identify the types of emergencies and disasters that your emergency response plan (ERP) will cover for your community (which you identified in the Module 1 SLP).
Conduct a Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis for the disasters or emergencies you identified above. Begin with the disaster or emergency that you believe poses the greatest threat to your specific subject for the SLP.
a.Complete the following table by identifying hazards as described in the Hazard Analysis section of the Module 2 Home page.
Note:
Hazard
Magnitude
Frequency
Seasonal Pattern
Duration
Speed of Onset
Priority
