post has three assignments
An ongoing debate in practice and academia is the total remuneration a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) receives compared to the recent or current performance of an organisation, especially when a loss occurs. Some reports in the media or from peak body organisations and associations discuss the huge divergences, for example, a salary package (including payouts when CEOs leave voluntarily or otherwise) in the many millions of dollars when a loss of much greater proportions is reported.
Conduct a review of remuneration as a corporate governance issue and write a report with your findings. Use the concepts, tools and techniques learned in this subject to review the extent of these statements at the individual, board, organisation or other levels.
These focus questions could guide you in writing your report:
• How are some organisations able to successfully align CEO/executive remuneration with the organisation’s objectives to maximise shareholder wealth via organisational performance? Discuss what has led to the success and how it could be sustained (e.g. short term and long term incentives, subcommittee(s) oversight, etc.)
• What are some of the corporate governance causes that lead to organisations being criticised or being less successful in aligning CEO/executive remuneration with organisations objectives to maximise shareholder wealth via organisational performance. Particularly when large losses occur or small profits. Discuss the reasons for this and what can be done to address them.
Your assessment must include:
• A description of the issue related to the remuneration as a corporate governance issue.
• An outline of the bases or criteria for the review of the CEO/executive remuneration and organisational performance governance issue(s). For example, mention which rules, standards or guiding principles are relevant for the review, discuss their importance and why it is appropriate for you to use them.
• A critical review of the organisation’s governance applying the relevant concepts, principles, standards or other tools and techniques learnt during this subject.
• Recommendations for suggested improvement based on your review.
It is important to demonstrate your knowledge about the corporate governance issue and to clearly reference your sources. Read about your issue in journal articles (using the AIB Online Library), books (including the textbook), industry reports, business literature, etc. Remember to note down your sources and reference your sources in the report.
To do well you need to structure your discussion appropriately, use good references, and clearly link recommendations to the description and analysis presented earlier in the report.
2: CASE STUDY
Order Description
Question 3: In Chapter 2 “Your Business Idea: The Quest for Value”, Robert Rainsford was
introduced in the FRANK’S ALL-AMERICAN BARBEQUE case. He has returned to the famil?
business and is very enthusiastic about expanding the business. He has identified four
options: (a) expanding the restaurant either at its current site or elsewhere in Fairfield; (b)
opening several similar-sized restaurants in nearby towns; (c) using the Internet to expand
sales; and (d) expanding the sales of Frank’s sauces from a local store to a regional
supermarket chain. Any one of these ideas would represent a change from his father’s
business model. Given that he had not expressed any interest in the management of the
business, how should he go about approaching his father with these ideas? If the company
expands, should Robert approach his sister and her husband about taking a more active role
in the business? What should their roles be?
PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
3: Capstone Demonstration on Policies and Regulations
Order Description
Demonstrate your knowledge and insight of health policy at a “capstone level.” Please visit one of the health care management or nursing feedback websites, and read one or more current or past regulations or policies—and with your enlightened understanding on how important it is that regulations and policies be kept “current” in the context of our rapidly changing society and health care system, post a feedback remark onto the a site of your choice (examples below); and to earn points for this assignment, save and upload comment(s) you posted. Make sure that your comment(s) are substantive and articulately expressed. Consequently, post no fewer than 250 words and no more than 500 words of verbiage to the site. Copy/paste your remarks onto a Word document and submit them using the Week 7 Assignment link. Be sure to include a title page and a reference list—if references were used to support your post.
Go to:
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/newsroom/rfc/
or https://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Delivery-Systems/Institutional-Care/Preadmission-Screening-and-Resident-Review-PASRR.html
or https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/regulations-and-guidance.html or https://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/about-the-law/
or https://www.nursingworld.org/FunctionalMenuCategories/FAQs
or https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hsrinfo/health_economics.html
or https://www.va.gov/nursing/
or feel free to visit any other website not shown above (Others are AHA, ASHE, NONP—your choice)
At that site, go to both: “Requests for Comments” and “Federal Register Notices” or the related tab where feedback is accepted.
Each student will select either a policy that is currently open for comment or one in the past that has closed. Note that the submission link for an open comment is different than for closed policies…yet comments are welcomed at any time even if the policy comment period has closed.
Craft a succinct response with references on the policy issue of the student’s choice and submit as per the directions on the various tabs. Make your comment substantive—one page of text or more.
