In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of informal fallacy
aguments. This mignment allows you to examine common fallacies in everyday
reasoning.
Stat by reading the aticle “Fallacies of Logic: Argumentation Cons” found in the
Argosy University Online Libray.
Shapiro, I. D. (2007). Fallacies of logic: Argumentation cons. et Oetera, 64(1), 75-86.
Retrieved from
http://www.thecampuscommon.com/Iibray/ezproxy/ticketdemocsasp’?
sch:auo&tu1:http://search.proquest.com/docview/2041 058$
Using the types of aguments listed in this aticle or in the module readings, respond
to the following:
Draft two original fallacies. Do not identify the fallacies, allow you peers to determine
what fallacy you example represents.
Next, using the Internet, respond to the following:
Reseach a third informal fallacy not already covered in the readings.
identify and define the fallacy. For example, appeal to tradition, false dichotomy, etc.
Explain why this type of fallacy is a bad way of reasoning.
Construct an original fallacy agument of that type.
Provide a citation for you souce. Ensue that you apply APA standads to the citation
of souces.
Support you statements with examples and scholaly references.
Write you initial response in 200-300 words
